Which version of this question ought to be present, and why? Who does the most unpleasant dirty work in full communism?
An edit war has occurred over its title and body text in the past day despite being stable for quite a number of years.
Which version of this question ought to be present, and why? Who does the most unpleasant dirty work in full communism?
An edit war has occurred over its title and body text in the past day despite being stable for quite a number of years.
The original title was
Who shovels shit in full communism?
The question was flagged by two different users for "rude or abusive".
Question titles should not include profanity. I therefore edited the question to still say the same thing but without profanity.
Just because this profanity was overlooked for 3 years does not mean it is too late to correct this lapse. Also note that the Code of Conduct of the Stack Exchange network was overhauled recently. So the standards which applied 3 years ago are not the standards which apply today.
And while the new code of conduct still does not explicitly forbid profanity, I believe that avoiding profane language is crucial to reach its stated main goal to "build a community that is rooted in kindness, collaboration, and mutual respect".
Also relevant is this question on the general meta stackexchange "Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?". tl;dr: No, they are not.
Question titles may not contain curse words. This was the case long before the new CoC. The reason is that the title may show up on other sites in the Stack Exchange network where swearing or offensive words are not allowed at all (I am not sure to what extent it is allowed here, so this post does not make a statement on that / the body of the question).
For reference, see this post by Jeff Atwood (one of the founders of Stack Overflow and then moderator on the SE network) on the ELU Meta site.
I acknowledge that other editors seem to be aware of the [culturally incomprehensible to this en_Au speaker] blue code that stack exchange has chosen to operate with. I am surprised that effective moderation on the topic took many years for a high voted and moderately bumped question and answer set—part of any reaction here is surely to dead letter enforcement. Culture shock and delayed enforcement aside better substitute text ought to be used: that the particular bowdlerisation chosen is inappropriate.
"Shit shovelling" is a powerful alliterative and visceral description, and common term in my variety of English, for a form of labour generally considered to be quintessentially and viscerally unpleasant. While knackery or sex work or psych nursing may have it beat for unpleasantness, the social position of manually disposing of human fæces animates the discussion regarding the form of labour and the general desirable organisation of labour. Manual nightsoil labour is the go to vehicle in the metaphor for unpleasant work. The decision for the example trade was chosen as it is the typical example, the manner of phrasing because of the need to emphasise the viscerality and bodily repugnance.
A superior bowdlerisation within the operating blue code would be "shovelling excrement" due to the poetic and visceral hardness and superiority to "unpleasant" or "fæces" both of which are consonally softer and stink less.