Timeline for Troll questions lately from single-use accounts
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2019 at 5:37 | history | edited | 264 champagne bottles on ice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 394 characters in body
|
| Sep 30, 2019 at 18:04 | comment | added | LаngLаngС | "Personalised medical advice is…" Or legal, or again philosophy? Really strange example you found there. But as so often in such cases: weirdness alone is something we might assess. But whether it's really trollish depends imo on repetition (and SE has some resident single.minded people?). With single-use accounts only mods or even higher-ups have that info to check? | |
| Sep 30, 2019 at 17:59 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | @LangLangC: we had more weird topics recently; one that came up a couple of times was "inverting the social contract". Here's a not-yet-deleted instance: politics.stackexchange.com/questions/46052/… | |
| Sep 30, 2019 at 17:53 | comment | added | LаngLаngС | As the saying goes: heterosexuality is not working for anyone, men and women just don't fit together… But honestly, that Q topic seems confused, to say the least, but the format is so far away from "useful". As a philosophy or social policy question the topic might have some merits, and in pubs it might 'save the evening' from comparing football statistics. In short: "good faith" is most probably not the issue in that example? | |
| Sep 18, 2019 at 4:56 | history | edited | 264 champagne bottles on ice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 397 characters in body
|
| Sep 18, 2019 at 4:12 | history | edited | 264 champagne bottles on ice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 272 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2019 at 15:01 | history | edited | 264 champagne bottles on ice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2019 at 14:55 | history | answered | 264 champagne bottles on ice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |