Timeline for Why did my Trump's speech question get the response that it did?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2021 at 20:12 | comment | added | Joe W | @RayButterworth If you are asking a question about a speech you shouldn't pick a few parts that appear to try and state a narrative you want especially when the quotes you use also include sections that would imply the opposite. In the end what the question looks like now is much better as it is not trying to draw a conclusion either way. Don't try to lead a question with what you think is proof of something instead make that into an answer. | |
| Jan 17, 2021 at 20:09 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | @RayButterworth: that doesn't go too well. The other mq I linked to discussed a q that was on a similarly controversial topic, and in which the OP made a fairly long attempt to "narrow" the possible answers. | |
| Jan 17, 2021 at 20:05 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | Still it got closed a 2nd time around, after those edits. | |
| Jan 17, 2021 at 19:34 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | The two instance I chose might have looked like cherry picking, but it you read the whole thing, there are only two instances where he directly addressed the crowd. So there wasn't really much else to choose. The point of those quotations was to show that the only directives he directly gave to the crowd were the opposite of violence, so on the surface the speech appeared to be the opposite of what it was accused of being. I was simply interested in learning what other people were seeing there (as proof of calling for violence) that I couldn't see. | |
| Jan 17, 2021 at 17:50 | history | answered | Joe W | CC BY-SA 4.0 |