Timeline for Is posting something offensive from a third party, "in order to debunk", in scope for this site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 at 21:33 | comment | added | Ekadh Singh | @JoeW low effort, maybe. An attempt to troll, I highly doubt it. | |
| Jun 1, 2021 at 21:24 | history | edited | Joe W | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 284 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2021 at 21:15 | comment | added | Joe W | @Shadow1024 Even if we did mark them as already answered that wouldn't stop the noise. | |
| Jun 1, 2021 at 21:15 | comment | added | Joe W | @EkadhSingh If there was good faith involved there would be more to the question than just posting a picture of a meme and asking if it is true or not. What I see in a question like that is an attempt to spread a mesage. | |
| Jun 1, 2021 at 19:39 | comment | added | Shadow1024 | Point 2 - not so bad, in practice one would run quite fast of talking points working in favour of this particular ideology and can be dealt with "already answered". | |
| Jun 1, 2021 at 19:34 | comment | added | Ekadh Singh | -1 because you didn’t assume good faith in the asker, as you should (talking about point 1). Also, for point 2, every (successful) site has a never-ending list of questions, so for the reasons you mentioned that’s not necessarily a bad thing. | |
| Jun 1, 2021 at 19:13 | history | answered | Joe W | CC BY-SA 4.0 |