Timeline for Should we have the "Controversial Post" post notice?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 18, 2021 at 7:58 | history | edited | Golden Cuy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 468 characters in body
|
Jul 17, 2021 at 14:25 | comment | added | JJJ Mod | Yea, I'm not sure what the objection is to the notice in those cases. In both cases there were a lot of unnecessary comments. For example that question has 82 deleted comments at the moment. Some were addressing legitimate issues about the post while others were rather unfriendly back and froths that focused on users (or some broader political debate) rather than the post. That'' what the notice aims to prevent. | |
Jul 17, 2021 at 13:43 | comment | added | Joe W | Please move those examples into your question | |
Jul 17, 2021 at 7:32 | comment | added | Golden Cuy | @JJJ I was thinking of both politics.stackexchange.com/questions/66399/… and politics.stackexchange.com/a/63940/270 (note: the latter is about an answer, not the question) | |
Jul 17, 2021 at 4:04 | comment | added | JJJ Mod | Are you referring to any posts in particular? As for off-topic posts, there are of course other mechanisms which work regardless of the notice: downvoting, closing, flagging as low quality and voting to delete. | |
Jul 17, 2021 at 3:02 | history | answered | Golden Cuy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |