In the comments to one answer here, we discussed whether or not it's should be considered acceptable to, when writing an answer, include a comment about the source of a claim.

My feeling is this - there are numerous misleading and false claims made on the internet (both intentional and unintentional). Treating all sources as equally valid can increase the number of questions that include inaccurate information in them, and makes it more difficult for individuals to answer these questions (since instead of looking into particular facts, people need to figure out from the falsehood what the initial kernel of truth was). If one looks into a claim and finds it to be inaccurate and only appearing on non-mainstream sites, it isn't inappropriate to include a comment about the source in an answer.

Others disagree. So the question is this, is it appropriate to include a comment in your answer about the source of claims made in the question, and if it is, when is it appropriate?

Edit: I generally agree with the views expressed here:

With so much important stuff to talk about, an answer that merely gives shallow >or controversial advice such as "you're using the wrong brace style and >indentation width" is likely to be outcompeted by a more insightful answer.

My advice is, it's fine to offer opinionated advice, but only as an >afterthought following a solidly grounded critique.

2 Answers 2


It is 100% on topic to dispute the veracity of a claim, either in a comment or an answer. That is how debates are won. Of course, in doing so, you've just made a claim of your own. So be careful.

  • It is one thing to say that the source of the claim is sensaitionalist. It is another to say that the source should be avoided all together. Jul 15, 2014 at 14:51

Sources are really only a means to an end. They help the reader verify the information that is presented to them. If you have doubts about the credibility of the sources, then the sources never really achieved their goal in the first place.

You're not obligate to accept any source that's presented to you, and you can feel free to comment or down vote if an answer is dependent on sources that you're not satisfied with.

  • This is in reguards to the source of a claim in the question not the answer, and the OP's editorializing in his answer that the source of the claim being questioned should be ignored in its entirety. Not about a source in an answer being used to reference that answer. Jul 16, 2014 at 13:44

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .