My question, Is there anything which may not be included in an agreement?, was put on hold as being too broad.
This question is intended as a political theory (philosophy) question. I limited the scope of the question by specifying certain theories that I am interested in. To me, it seems that the question is not too broad because a good answer would be required to reference those theories explicitly, and because we could judge what a good answer is by how well it summarizes, compares, or contrasts those theories.
Some of the comments suggested that the question could be improved and possibly re-opened. What changes could be made to improve the question?