I'm trying to make a sense of a declined "rude or abusive" flag.
The flag was declined with a canned "declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it" message without a custom explanation.
The post had double-dose of rudeness:
"Obama, and he doesn't seem like an asshat (unlike the current president),"
violated the "Be Nice" rule, as elaborated in Shog9's answer to "https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/286090/119280"
"So why da fuck did he win the nobel peace prize?"
is just plain out rude, seemingly uncontrovercially.
I'm trying to understand why the moderator declined the flag - was there something wrong about my judgement about its content? Or merely the timing of flag handling since by the time the question was edited by someone trying to improve it?