During close review process I came across this question and I did not know what to do (I skipped it): it sounds kind of silly (thus many downvotes), but it seems to be technically correct (it is about governments and asks for a study example, so it is clearly not broad).
Currently, it has 4 close votes:
The primary purpose of this question appears to be to promote or discredit a specific political cause, group or politician. It does not appear to be a good-faith effort to learn more about governments, policies and political processes as defined in the help center.
It also has a good answer explaining why the requested study cannot happen.
Personally, I don't think the close reason is correctly applied to this question and I am wondering what should we do with this kind of questions?
Question: Should naive, but technically correct questions be closed?