3

Not sure if this is a question for Politics or Skeptics (or possibly the Meta for either). I would think that those two sites, and possibly History, would be the primary targets.

Politically motivated internet trolls are all over the news, in Facebook, on Twitter, Reddit... anywhere where people have opinions.

Has there been evidence of StackExchange being targeted by state sponsored, or party sponsored groups?

migrated from politics.stackexchange.com Oct 22 '18 at 23:45

This question came from our site for people interested in governments, policies, and political processes.

4

Yes, users with very strong political leanings and an even stronger desire to spread them are a regular appearance on this website.

Unfortunately, it is impossible to tell if these people are paid by some government or non-government organization or if they are just private people who very strongly believe in some political cause and spread it in their free time. I don't think it is very likely that Politics Stack Exchange is being targeted directly by any organized propaganda operations, though. We aren't Facebook, Twitter or Reddit. Our community is still relatively small. I think it flies far under the radar of any serious propaganda organisations. We might of course still see some indirect effect of these efforts in form of regular people who got radicalized somewhere else and now feel they should spread the "wisdom" to us. But that doesn't make these users any less obnoxious.

Fortunately, the Stack Exchange environment isn't very friendly to these users. Posts with obvious political slant - no matter which direction - often attract a lot of downvotes. Posts which are just political propaganda and include no useful on-topic content often get deleted by the community before we mods get to do it.

  • Suggested edit s/is impossible/is not currently possible/. – agc Oct 27 '18 at 12:25
  • 1
    Re "under the radar": COINTELPRO spent much of its time on petty minutia, and often targeted smaller groups than Politics.SE. It's advocates would probably argue that it was easier to stifle a small fire than fight a large one. Presumably similar groups would feel the same way. – agc Oct 27 '18 at 12:44
  • @agc The difference is that COINTELPRO was about disrupting political groups before they became too radical and powerful, while modern social media manipulation is more about creating them. The FBI was performing surgical strikes, while the FSB is carpet-bombing. – Philipp Oct 27 '18 at 12:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .