I propose that be made a synonym for . Or vice versa.

Update: what do and have that the Donbas(s) lacks?

| |
  • 5
    Do we need a tag for [donbass]? Wouldn't it be more descriptive to make a tag for [ukrainian-crisis]? – divibisan Sep 25 at 16:47
  • 1
    I guess. I feel like questions tagged with [donbass] are primarily going to be about the current civil war/conflict with Russia, in which case a tag focused on the event would be more clear than one focused on the region, but I don't feel too strongly about it. At the very least, you should add some usage guidance to your tag wiki suggestion so it's clear why the tag exists and what it's for. – divibisan Sep 25 at 17:12
  • 1
    @divibisan, "Ukrainian crisis" and "civil war in Ukraine" also look very inaccurate. There is no crisis and no civil war here. – bytebuster Sep 25 at 21:15
  • There IS crisis, and definitely a civil war there. Recently, Fokin - one of members of ukrainians delegation was fired by Zelensky, because of telling too much truth about it: rt.com/russia/… . Why RT? Because Ukraine is no more on the headlines of the western media. – user2501323 Oct 1 at 8:49
  • @user2501323, yeah, and Fokin was dishonorably discharged from the delegation immediately after that claim. – bytebuster Oct 1 at 12:23
  • And what's difference between Zelensky and Poroshenko now? (despite the fact, that one is the ukrainian oligarch himself, and one another is another oligarch's puppet) Zelensky rating also feels that there is no difference, and is lowering fast – user2501323 Oct 1 at 12:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .