Why are the questions about Iran's nuclear threat against Israel off-topic

Question

Many questions about the Iranian Nuclear threat against Israel and the poor performance of the Biden administration have been closed as off-topic. (Israel itself is also to blame for not taking the Iranian nuclear threat seriously). The Biden government's diplomacy is also foggy and has no clear future given the Iranian regime's secrecy.

But why off-topic? Certainly during Trump's presidency, Iran's nuclear threat was weaker.

Anyway, I do not know how Iran's acquisition of a nuclear weapons can be taken offtopic.

I asked this question for example so that you can see how questions related to the Iranian nuclear threat are eliminated.

One of the comments clearly likes only the part related to criticizing Trump and wants to censor the part related to Biden!.

it seems like an interesting question without the argumentative part linking US presidencies to Iran's alleged uranium enrichment rates

Answer 1

I'm not sure what questions you're talking about, but questions that are intended to promote or discredit are explicitly off-topic here. In fact, of the main close reasons on this site is:

The primary purpose of this question appears to be to promote or discredit a specific political cause, group or politician. It does not appear to be a good-faith effort to learn more about governments, policies and political processes as defined in the help center.

From your question here, it's clear you want to use this site in order to make arguments blaming specific groups. See the direct quotes from your question above:

poor performance of the Biden administration

Israel itself is also to blame

The Biden government's diplomacy is also foggy and has no clear future

This is not the site for what you want to do. Similar questions asking, essentially, "Why is Trump so bad?" were closed too for the same reason. If you want to rant about why Biden is the worst, feel free to do so on Facebook or Reddit, but on StackExchange, we have clear standards for what kinds of questions are on-topic on each site, and this is clearly not.

Answer 2

The original text of the question read as follows:

An official from the Biden government's negotiating team has recently claimed:

Trump’s Maximum Pressure Campaign Failed Miserably*. -- Robert Malley.

During whose presidency did Iran increase its uranium enrichment rate from 20% to 60%? Obviously Biden.

By what measure did Trump's stance on Iran fail?

The problem I see with this question is that it appears clearly and heavily slanted against the Biden administration (I say 'appears' because that may not have been your intention). If I were to paraphrase what you wrote it would be something like:

A Biden official said something bad about a Trump policy when clearly Biden's policy is worse. Why would he do that?

The use of an embedded rhetorical question in particular makes the whole question sound pushy, as though it's implying that the Biden official is outright lying. And the last question comes off almost as though you are daring people to prove you wrong. Politics SE excludes both heavily loaded questions and questions meant to confirm a worldview or belief, so you can see why this might have been received poorly.

If you wanted to write a more neutral question, you'd want something like the following:

Under the Biden administration, Iran's uranium enrichment rate rose from 20% to 60%, and yet Robert Malley claimed that Trump's policies towards Iran failed miserably. What are the differences between Biden's and Trump's approaches, and how should we evaluate them?

That might still fail as asking for too much speculation, but at least you're not importing untoward presumptions, such as the presumption that Iran's increased production implies that it is producing more (or any) weapons grade uranium.