A single user with close privileges closed this question: What are the implications of the sabotage by Russian FSB of the plot to assassinate President Zelensky of Ukraine?. The stated reason in the comments is below:
I am closing this question because "the implications" would be pure opinion and speculations. While this might be an interesting question for a discussion forum, it is unsuitable for an objective Q&A site like this. Further, the question is based on a claim which might just be war propaganda, which makes it even less suitable for this site.
The "propaganda" claim was addressed by providing a definition of propaganda according to this site policy: "Questions relating to information used to promote a political cause or point of view, usually misleading in nature.", as per: https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/propaganda - clearly the question does not fit this definition. Furthermore, 3 mainstream sources reported the cited story: Washington Post, Jerusalem Post and UPI. I doubt that they all can reasonably be considered "propaganda". If they are, such policy should be stated explicitly and the list of propaganda-associated vs allowed sources must be made explicit and public on the site Help Center (not buried in meta).
The "pure opinion and speculations" issue was addressed by adding the notes section below.
I am not asking for pure opinion-based answers or speculations. These will be off-topic for this site.
Please make your answers suitable for this site as defined in the Help Center. Note that this requires, among others, for answers to be supported by facts and citations that are distinct from war propaganda as defined on this site. The definition of the war propaganda will be posted below.
The question was submitted to be reopened, and came back with this canned comment: "Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations. This will help others answer the question.". Suspiciously absent were now "propaganda" and "pure opinion and speculations" close reasons, and the stated close reason seems to disregard my "NOTES" section.
I invite constructive, deliberative discussion w.r.t. improving and reopening the question.
Questions which invite speculation or soapboxing, or contain soapboxing themselves, will get closed as "Promotes or discredits a political cause", "Speculative" or "Opinion-Based".