23

People don't downvote you because they disagree that your opinion should be posted on this website, they disagree that any opinion should be posted on this website. Many people on this website will downvote any question or answer which is one-sided and opinionated even when they completely agree with the opinion. The reason is that such contributions do ...


17

It is understandable when some users do not believe that Donald Trump is a reliable source, because he has repeatedly been caught making false statements in the past. That does not mean that everything Trump said is automatically wrong, but it also shows that not every statement he makes should be believed without any skepticism. Further, the answer claims ...


10

Let me break this down as to where you went wrong and how you can get it right in the future Mexico paying for the wall by tariffs is not my invention, it's absolutely endorsed by the White House and the president himself. Being the president, he speaks on behalf of the country. The Trump administration consistently insist the wall will be indirectly paid ...


9

Let's break down what you are claiming here: Unfortunately, some users are probably not aware of our rules. For instance, my answer received downvotes for no reason: Plenty of reasons were offered. You don't seem to agree with them. However, that's not the same as "for no reason." Mexico paying for the wall by tariffs is not my invention, it's ...


8

Your issue is in assuming that citing the president, the white house or administration official sources count as "reliable sources". In fact, anything that the current american president has said is likely to need additional backup to be established as fact, especially since he has a widely and largely established practice of speaking complete falsities. ...


7

One thing I noticed about your question is that it straight up tell us what the purpose of fluoridation is(dental benefits), and then goes on to ask what the real motivation behind it is. The problem with that is that even if there is some hidden motivation behind it, then we, by definition, don't have sufficient proof of the motivation, and therefore ...


5

First one is easily explained by the fact that the original down-voting and closing pertained to original, bad, version of that question, whose title wasn't the objective-ish answerable "plausible outcomes" but instead a wholly subjective speculative "What is going to happen after the Catalan referendum?" Please note that once a user fixed the question up ...


5

For serial downvoting patterns like that the system will automatically unto it after a day or two. In the meantime, I'll see If there's anything I can do to investigate this, and see if there's any Stack Exchange standard remedy for this kind of behavior.


4

Is there any correlation between gender inequality and women choosing making porn for a living? The question is fascinating, but off topic, as it's not really about politics. The data you are looking for may influence policy decisions, however for the question to be on topic it would actually have to be about the policy decisions, or at the very least about ...


2

Adding to @zaq's great answer, you seem to have received only three downvotes so far and two of them were cast even before you gained any reputation to lose. I know it's annoying and you want to know who downvoted your post, but nobody, including a moderator, has an access to this information unless they investigate a serial downvoting. If you suspect a ...


2

Admittedly, this took me a while to parse - I had to keep reminding myself that the vote totals you are showing are the downvotes received not given. What you are saying What your list is showing is this: 8% of the people who have taken the time to consider your answer and are motivated enough to spend a point of reputation have found your answers ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible