Timeline for Should be try to get askers to include references in their questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2015 at 21:48 | history | edited | Sam I am says Reinstate MonicaMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 141 characters in body
|
| Jul 15, 2015 at 15:08 | comment | added | clem steredenn | A good illustration is the currently highest voted answer starts with "It isn't possible to discuss why every person, or even every politician, might be opposed to the nuclear accord with Iran." | |
| Jul 15, 2015 at 15:06 | comment | added | clem steredenn | I don't really agree with the statement: "The Republican opposition Iran Nuclear Deal is a good example of a fact that most people are already familiar with." I certainly heard of the news of the agreement, however, not living in the US, american news aren't my primary source of information, so no, I haven't read anything about the specific of the Republican Party's opposition. Otherwise, you are right that a reference does not solve everything. I just don't like sentences that start with "some dude did that", without even telling us who, in which circumstances. It matters. | |
| Jul 15, 2015 at 14:52 | history | answered | Sam I am says Reinstate MonicaMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |