Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
added 53 characters in body
Source Link
Ekadh Singh
  • 3.1k
  • 7
  • 22

The following answer has been deleted by Mod Philipp without any supporting reason other than their own personal reasons.

Stack Exchange Guidance

The Stack Exchange Guidance on deletions clearly states

Why and how are some answers deleted?

Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:

  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question
  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question

Nowhere in that list does it state that a Mod may delete an answer because they feel it does not have enough citations.

Mod also accused the OP of "plagiarization" despite the fact that the OP clearly referred to the following reports directly

Regulations influencing the use of biofuels in transportation as well as biomass in the heat and power market are outlined in the EU Energy and Climate Change Package (CCP) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The CCP includes...(insert text)...

Right to Edit

In addition, the Mod has made no attempt to improve or edit the answer themselves by adding in citations which they clearly know since they have identified the passages which need citations.

The deletion appears personal in nature given the deletion occurred within 22 minutes of the Mod demands. Suitable time was not even provided to improve the answer.

Citation Overuse

Every single line in the answer is potentially attributable to a source since it is comprised wholly of facts and data. Although some data may be drawn from Wikipedia all of the information is freely available via any internet search and none of it is proprietary.

Inflammatory Behaviour

The Mod has attempted to use the Stack Exchange guidance to imply the site will somehow be targeted for copyright infringement because of the OP's action. Notwithstanding the answer is already indexed by Google, that is a gross overstatement about what has happened and merely is a reason for the Mod to ram through his personal beliefs and ensure the answer is deleted.

Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

The following answer has been deleted by Mod Philipp without any supporting reason other than their own personal reasons.

Stack Exchange Guidance

The Stack Exchange Guidance on deletions clearly states

Why and how are some answers deleted?

Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:

  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question

Nowhere in that list does it state that a Mod may delete an answer because they feel it does not have enough citations.

Mod also accused the OP of "plagiarization" despite the fact that the OP clearly referred to the following reports directly

Regulations influencing the use of biofuels in transportation as well as biomass in the heat and power market are outlined in the EU Energy and Climate Change Package (CCP) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The CCP includes...(insert text)...

Right to Edit

In addition, the Mod has made no attempt to improve or edit the answer themselves by adding in citations which they clearly know since they have identified the passages which need citations.

The deletion appears personal in nature given the deletion occurred within 22 minutes of the Mod demands. Suitable time was not even provided to improve the answer.

Citation Overuse

Every single line in the answer is potentially attributable to a source since it is comprised wholly of facts and data. Although some data may be drawn from Wikipedia all of the information is freely available via any internet search and none of it is proprietary.

Inflammatory Behaviour

The Mod has attempted to use the Stack Exchange guidance to imply the site will somehow be targeted for copyright infringement because of the OP's action. Notwithstanding the answer is already indexed by Google, that is a gross overstatement about what has happened and merely is a reason for the Mod to ram through his personal beliefs and ensure the answer is deleted.

Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

The following answer has been deleted by Mod Philipp without any supporting reason other than their own personal reasons.

Stack Exchange Guidance

The Stack Exchange Guidance on deletions clearly states

Why and how are some answers deleted?

Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:

  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question

Nowhere in that list does it state that a Mod may delete an answer because they feel it does not have enough citations.

Mod also accused the OP of "plagiarization" despite the fact that the OP clearly referred to the following reports directly

Regulations influencing the use of biofuels in transportation as well as biomass in the heat and power market are outlined in the EU Energy and Climate Change Package (CCP) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The CCP includes...(insert text)...

Right to Edit

In addition, the Mod has made no attempt to improve or edit the answer themselves by adding in citations which they clearly know since they have identified the passages which need citations.

The deletion appears personal in nature given the deletion occurred within 22 minutes of the Mod demands. Suitable time was not even provided to improve the answer.

Citation Overuse

Every single line in the answer is potentially attributable to a source since it is comprised wholly of facts and data. Although some data may be drawn from Wikipedia all of the information is freely available via any internet search and none of it is proprietary.

Inflammatory Behaviour

The Mod has attempted to use the Stack Exchange guidance to imply the site will somehow be targeted for copyright infringement because of the OP's action. Notwithstanding the answer is already indexed by Google, that is a gross overstatement about what has happened and merely is a reason for the Mod to ram through his personal beliefs and ensure the answer is deleted.

Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

Commonmark migration
Source Link

The following answer has been deleted by Mod Philipp without any supporting reason other than their own personal reasons.

##Stack Exchange Guidance

Stack Exchange Guidance

The Stack Exchange Guidance on deletions clearly states

Why and how are some answers deleted?

 

Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:

  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question

Nowhere in that list does it state that a Mod may delete an answer because they feel it does not have enough citations.

Mod also accused the OP of "plagiarization" despite the fact that the OP clearly referred to the following reports directly

Regulations influencing the use of biofuels in transportation as well as biomass in the heat and power market are outlined in the EU Energy and Climate Change Package (CCP) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The CCP includes...(insert text)...

##Right to Edit

Right to Edit

In addition, the Mod has made no attempt to improve or edit the answer themselves by adding in citations which they clearly know since they have identified the passages which need citations.

The deletion appears personal in nature given the deletion occurred within 22 minutes of the Mod demands. Suitable time was not even provided to improve the answer.

##Citation Overuse

Citation Overuse

Every single line in the answer is potentially attributable to a source since it is comprised wholly of facts and data. Although some data may be drawn from Wikipedia all of the information is freely available via any internet search and none of it is proprietary.

##Inflammatory Behaviour

Inflammatory Behaviour

The Mod has attempted to use the Stack Exchange guidance to imply the site will somehow be targeted for copyright infringement because of the OP's action. Notwithstanding the answer is already indexed by Google, that is a gross overstatement about what has happened and merely is a reason for the Mod to ram through his personal beliefs and ensure the answer is deleted.

##Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

The following answer has been deleted by Mod Philipp without any supporting reason other than their own personal reasons.

##Stack Exchange Guidance

The Stack Exchange Guidance on deletions clearly states

Why and how are some answers deleted?

 

Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:

  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question

Nowhere in that list does it state that a Mod may delete an answer because they feel it does not have enough citations.

Mod also accused the OP of "plagiarization" despite the fact that the OP clearly referred to the following reports directly

Regulations influencing the use of biofuels in transportation as well as biomass in the heat and power market are outlined in the EU Energy and Climate Change Package (CCP) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The CCP includes...(insert text)...

##Right to Edit

In addition, the Mod has made no attempt to improve or edit the answer themselves by adding in citations which they clearly know since they have identified the passages which need citations.

The deletion appears personal in nature given the deletion occurred within 22 minutes of the Mod demands. Suitable time was not even provided to improve the answer.

##Citation Overuse

Every single line in the answer is potentially attributable to a source since it is comprised wholly of facts and data. Although some data may be drawn from Wikipedia all of the information is freely available via any internet search and none of it is proprietary.

##Inflammatory Behaviour

The Mod has attempted to use the Stack Exchange guidance to imply the site will somehow be targeted for copyright infringement because of the OP's action. Notwithstanding the answer is already indexed by Google, that is a gross overstatement about what has happened and merely is a reason for the Mod to ram through his personal beliefs and ensure the answer is deleted.

##Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

The following answer has been deleted by Mod Philipp without any supporting reason other than their own personal reasons.

Stack Exchange Guidance

The Stack Exchange Guidance on deletions clearly states

Why and how are some answers deleted?

Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:

  • commentary on the question or other answers
  • asking another, different question
  • “thanks!” or “me too!” responses
  • exact duplicates of other answers
  • barely more than a link to an external site
  • not even a partial answer to the actual question

Nowhere in that list does it state that a Mod may delete an answer because they feel it does not have enough citations.

Mod also accused the OP of "plagiarization" despite the fact that the OP clearly referred to the following reports directly

Regulations influencing the use of biofuels in transportation as well as biomass in the heat and power market are outlined in the EU Energy and Climate Change Package (CCP) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The CCP includes...(insert text)...

Right to Edit

In addition, the Mod has made no attempt to improve or edit the answer themselves by adding in citations which they clearly know since they have identified the passages which need citations.

The deletion appears personal in nature given the deletion occurred within 22 minutes of the Mod demands. Suitable time was not even provided to improve the answer.

Citation Overuse

Every single line in the answer is potentially attributable to a source since it is comprised wholly of facts and data. Although some data may be drawn from Wikipedia all of the information is freely available via any internet search and none of it is proprietary.

Inflammatory Behaviour

The Mod has attempted to use the Stack Exchange guidance to imply the site will somehow be targeted for copyright infringement because of the OP's action. Notwithstanding the answer is already indexed by Google, that is a gross overstatement about what has happened and merely is a reason for the Mod to ram through his personal beliefs and ensure the answer is deleted.

Ultimately, if the Mod felt strongly enough, they could have added in the citations themselves which is precisely what we tell users to do to improve answers.

Source Link
Venture2099
  • 3.5k
  • 7
  • 7
Loading