Timeline for Is asking about hypocritical behaviour off topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2022 at 18:25 | answer | added | divibisan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 2, 2022 at 12:57 | answer | added | Jontia | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 24, 2022 at 23:21 | comment | added | uhoh | @divibisan the question was completely neutral and not a push question at all. The BBC raised an apparent dissonance between two things and I asked "is it so?" This allows just as easily for fact based answers of the type "actually there's a fundamental difference here" as well as "the two situations are similar and T did in fact say Canada supports the same thing he ended at home". I've never seen anything like this in other Stack Exchange sites, but here some folks just see stuff that isn't there. | |
| Feb 24, 2022 at 20:44 | comment | added | divibisan | The problem with the question wasn't "hypocrisy" specifically, but that it was written as a push question to argue that Trudeau was "bad" in some way. Questions that exist to push a specific view, whether that a politician is good or bad, are off-topic and should either be closed (we have a close reason for this) or edited to be objective and non-leading. The edited question is certainly an improvement over the original, though. | |
| Feb 24, 2022 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1496907824328318978 | ||
| Feb 18, 2022 at 0:45 | answer | added | Ted Wrigley | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 18, 2022 at 0:26 | answer | added | uhoh | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 17, 2022 at 13:06 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Feb 17, 2022 at 10:31 | comment | added | uhoh | In the particular case of the linked question it's even less a "random attack"; the origin of the question is the issue raised in the linked BBC article. | |
| Feb 17, 2022 at 9:12 | history | asked | Jontia | CC BY-SA 4.0 |