Timeline for Where/how do we draw the line between legal and political questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016 at 7:51 | history | edited | PhilippMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2016 at 21:03 | comment | added | LearnWorkLearn | @DJClayworth the legislative branch doesn't encompass all of government, in fact, the legislative branch is defined by law. For them to even exist requires some governing rules or law. Law defines government. | |
| Jul 17, 2013 at 21:09 | comment | added | Publius | The legislative bodies do not comprise the whole of the government. | |
| Jul 17, 2013 at 15:50 | comment | added | DJClayworth | "without government there is now law". Not true. If the whole of the legislative bodies took a couple of years off, the law would continue to function - just not be changed. | |
| Jul 17, 2013 at 15:46 | comment | added | DJClayworth | Saying "we don't have a law site yet, so we'll accept them for now" is a very bad policy. It will delay the creation of a genuine law site, and blur the line of this site. | |
| Dec 10, 2012 at 6:43 | comment | added | Tim Post | Even if a Law SE did exist, I think law and government are just too entwined to separate. The same can be said for history and politics, even though we have a thriving history community. | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 20:01 | history | answered | Graham Wager | CC BY-SA 3.0 |