I have previously asked:
How do we feel about "General Reference" questions that are somewhat answered on Wikipedia?
The answers and comments to that question basically boiled down to two major points:
Asking a question that is answered (rightly or wrongly) on Wikipedia that can be answered by copy/paste from Wikipedia is a bad idea (too trivial, not enough research).
However, claiming that "this shouldn't be asked because Wikipedia has an answer - even if you indicate you already read the Wiki article - runs into a problem of Wikipedia being notoriously opinionated and subjective on politics related topics.
My pwn personal pet example is "There is general consensus is that the right includes... nazis" quote - except that consensus only exists among people who generally don't identify themselves as "right". Surprise!
As such, do we welcome questions of the form:
I have read XYZ Wiki article, and upon reading it, I was not convinced that the following paragraph is correct (or properly referenced, or logically consistent with references, or simply unclear, pick one): {{include paragraph}}
Can some light be shed on that detail, and the seeming problem or unclear wording in the Wiki article?